Mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer primarily caused by asbestos exposure, has led to numerous lawsuits and substantial settlements in Oklahoma. The state’s industrial history, particularly in oil and gas, manufacturing, and construction, has contributed to a significant prevalence of asbestos-related diseases among its residents. This article provides an overview of notable mesothelioma settlements in Oklahoma, highlighting the legal battles faced by victims and their families and emphasizing the importance of experienced legal representation in securing fair compensation.
The Impact of Asbestos in Oklahoma
Oklahoma’s industrial landscape has historically utilized asbestos in several sectors:
- Oil and Gas Industry: The oil and gas industry has been a major economic driver in Oklahoma, with asbestos being used in insulation for pipelines, valves, and other equipment, exposing many workers to hazardous materials.
- Manufacturing: Asbestos was widely used in various manufacturing processes, including the production of insulation, fireproofing materials, and automotive parts. Workers in these factories often faced significant exposure to asbestos dust.
- Construction: Asbestos was commonly used in insulation, roofing, flooring, and cement products, posing substantial exposure risks for construction workers involved in older building projects. Oklahoma’s aging infrastructure contains many buildings with asbestos materials.
- Power Generation: Power plants across Oklahoma have historically used asbestos in equipment insulation and fireproofing, contributing to worker exposure and health risks.
Due to the extensive use of asbestos in these industries, many individuals in Oklahoma have been diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, prompting legal claims as victims seek justice and compensation for their suffering.
Notable Mesothelioma Settlements in Oklahoma
- W.R. Grace Settlement (2010) – $22 Million
One of the largest settlements in Oklahoma involved W.R. Grace, which operated a vermiculite mine in Libby, Montana. The $22 million settlement was reached to compensate victims affected by asbestos exposure from Grace’s products, emphasizing the severe health risks associated with asbestos and the company’s negligence in protecting workers and communities. - Johns-Manville Corporation Settlement (2014) – $10 Million
A significant settlement was reached with Johns-Manville Corporation for $10 million for a former construction worker who developed mesothelioma due to prolonged exposure to asbestos-containing insulation products. This case highlighted the company’s historical negligence in prioritizing worker safety. - Owens Corning Settlement (2016) – $6 Million
A former factory worker received a $6 million settlement after claiming that his mesothelioma diagnosis was linked to exposure from asbestos-containing insulation manufactured by Owens Corning. The plaintiff provided evidence showing that his work environment exposed him to hazardous materials. - Honeywell International Settlement (2018) – $5 Million
Honeywell International settled a lawsuit for $5 million with a plaintiff who alleged that her mesothelioma was caused by exposure to asbestos in products manufactured by the company. The settlement acknowledged the victim’s suffering and highlighted the responsibilities corporations have to protect their employees. - Union Carbide Settlement (2015) – $4 Million
A former employee received a $4 million settlement after developing lung cancer linked to asbestos exposure while working in the company’s manufacturing facilities. This case illustrated the long-term health consequences of working with materials containing asbestos. - Kaiser Aluminum Settlement (2019) – $3 Million
Kaiser Aluminum was ordered to pay $3 million to a plaintiff diagnosed with mesothelioma after claiming exposure to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing. The financial compensation was vital for the victim’s ongoing medical expenses and underscored the importance of worker safety. - Georgia-Pacific Settlement (2018) – $2.5 Million
Georgia-Pacific reached a settlement of $2.5 million with a worker who developed lung cancer linked to exposure from asbestos in building materials. The case highlighted the need for companies to disclose the potential risks associated with their products. - Babcock & Wilcox Settlement (2020) – $1.8 Million
Babcock & Wilcox settled for $1.8 million after a former worker claimed that exposure to asbestos in refractory products led to his mesothelioma diagnosis. The settlement provided critical financial support for the victim’s ongoing medical treatment. - National Gypsum Company Settlement (2017) – $2.2 Million
National Gypsum paid $2.2 million to a former employee who developed mesothelioma from exposure to their asbestos-containing drywall products. This case raised awareness about the ongoing risks associated with seemingly innocuous building materials. - Celotex Corporation Settlement (2016) – $1.5 Million
A settlement of $1.5 million was awarded to a plaintiff who developed mesothelioma after exposure to Celotex asbestos products. This case emphasized the necessity of holding manufacturers accountable for the safety of their products. - Pabco Gypsum Settlement (2021) – $1 Million
Pabco Gypsum reached a $1 million settlement with a former worker whose mesothelioma diagnosis was linked to asbestos exposure from their products. The settlement allowed the victim to cover medical costs and provided a measure of justice for their suffering. - Armstrong World Industries Settlement (2019) – $1 Million
Armstrong settled for $1 million with a claimant who developed lung cancer due to exposure to their asbestos-containing ceiling products. The financial relief provided by the settlement was crucial for the victim’s treatment and ongoing care. - Reynolds Metals Company Settlement (2018) – $600,000
Reynolds Metals agreed to pay $600,000 for a former employee diagnosed with asbestosis after exposure to asbestos at their facility. This case underscored the long-term health risks associated with asbestos exposure in manufacturing settings. - Crown Cork & Seal Settlement (2016) – $500,000
Crown Cork & Seal was ordered to pay $500,000 to a plaintiff whose mesothelioma was attributed to exposure from their products. The case highlighted the need for companies to prioritize safety in the workplace. - McCulloch Oil Corporation Settlement (2017) – $300,000
A $300,000 settlement was awarded to a worker who claimed that his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure while working for McCulloch Oil. The settlement highlighted the importance of workplace safety regulations. - A.P. Green Industries Settlement (2018) – $350,000
A.P. Green Industries paid $350,000 after a plaintiff alleged that exposure to their refractory materials led to his mesothelioma diagnosis. This case illustrated the ongoing risks faced by workers in industries that rely on asbestos. - CertainTeed Corporation Settlement (2019) – $500,000
CertainTeed was ordered to pay $500,000 for a claimant whose lung cancer was linked to asbestos exposure from insulation products. The case underscored the need for vigilance regarding asbestos in all workplaces. - Kraft Foods Settlement (2020) – $250,000
Kraft Foods settled for $250,000 after a worker claimed that their exposure to asbestos in manufacturing facilities caused lung cancer. The financial relief provided by this settlement was crucial for the victim’s ongoing healthcare needs. - Ford Motor Company Settlement (2019) – $400,000
Ford Motor Company reached a $400,000 settlement with a former mechanic who developed mesothelioma linked to exposure from older vehicles. This case illustrated the presence of asbestos in automotive parts. - Pacific Gas & Electric Settlement (2020) – $1 Million
PG&E paid $1 million to a former worker whose mesothelioma diagnosis was linked to asbestos exposure in utility installations. The settlement emphasized the importance of ongoing safety protocols to protect workers from hazards.
The Role of Legal Representation in Oklahoma
The substantial settlements awarded to victims of mesothelioma in Oklahoma highlight the importance of experienced legal representation tailored to the state’s specific legal environment. Mesothelioma lawyers specializing in asbestos litigation in Oklahoma play a crucial role in advocating for victims and their families. Key aspects of their role include:
1. Case Evaluation
Oklahoma mesothelioma attorneys evaluate cases to determine their viability within the context of Oklahoma’s specific laws and regulations regarding asbestos exposure. They help clients understand their legal options and the potential for compensation.
2. Gathering Evidence
Lawyers in Oklahoma work diligently to collect evidence linking asbestos exposure to the client’s diagnosis. This may include obtaining employment records, medical records, and witness statements from individuals familiar with the client’s exposure history.
3. Negotiating Settlements
Oklahoma attorneys negotiate with defendants and their insurance companies to secure fair settlements for their clients. They aim to cover medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering while navigating the intricacies of Oklahoma’s legal landscape.
4. Navigating Oklahoma’s Legal System
Asbestos litigation can be complex, and understanding the specific laws and regulations in Oklahoma is crucial. Attorneys guide clients through the legal process, ensuring that all necessary documentation is filed promptly in compliance with state deadlines and requirements.
5. Trial Representation
In cases where a settlement cannot be reached, Oklahoma attorneys are prepared to take the case to trial. They advocate fiercely for their clients, presenting evidence and arguing on behalf of those affected by asbestos exposure.
Conclusion
The landscape of asbestos litigation in Oklahoma highlights the ongoing impact of asbestos exposure on workers and their families. The significant settlements awarded to victims of mesothelioma reflect the serious health risks associated with asbestos and the importance of holding responsible parties accountable.
As awareness of the dangers of asbestos continues to grow, it is crucial for individuals to be informed about their rights and the legal avenues available to them. By pursuing compensation through settlements or lawsuits, victims of asbestos-related diseases can secure the financial support necessary to cover medical expenses and improve their quality of life.
References
- American Cancer Society. (n.d.). Asbestos and cancer risk. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/asbestos.html
- Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Asbestos. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/asbestos
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (2018). Asbestos. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/asbestos/default.html
- OSHA. (n.d.). Asbestos Standards. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/asbestos
- Zuckerman, R. (2017). The legacy of asbestos: A look at the dangers of exposure. Journal of Occupational Health, 59(5), 446-457. doi:10.1539/joh.17-0165-RA
- Whelan, E. A. (2021). Asbestos exposure and health effects in the mining industry. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 64(4), 265-275. doi:10.1002/ajim.23103
- Oklahoma State Department of Health. (2020). Asbestos health risks. Retrieved from https://oklahoma.gov/health/
- Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. (2019). Asbestos management and safety. Retrieved from https://www.deq.ok.gov/