Home / Latest from Our Blog / Largest Kansas Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlements

Largest Kansas Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlements

By
Views: 8

Mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer primarily caused by asbestos exposure, has led to numerous lawsuits and substantial settlements in Kansas. The state’s industrial history, particularly in manufacturing, construction, and agriculture, has contributed to a notable prevalence of asbestos-related diseases among its residents. This article provides an overview of notable mesothelioma settlements in Kansas, highlighting the legal battles faced by victims and their families and emphasizing the importance of experienced legal representation in securing fair compensation.

The Impact of Asbestos in Kansas

Kansas has a diverse industrial landscape where asbestos was commonly used, particularly in the following sectors:

  • Manufacturing: The manufacturing industry in Kansas has historically utilized asbestos in various products, including insulation, fireproofing materials, and automotive parts, leading to significant exposure for workers.
  • Construction: Asbestos was widely utilized in insulation, roofing, flooring, and cement products, posing significant exposure risks for construction workers involved in older building projects.
  • Agriculture: Agricultural workers in Kansas may have encountered asbestos through the use of certain equipment and materials that contained asbestos, such as insulation in machinery.

The extensive use of asbestos in these industries has resulted in many individuals being diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, prompting legal claims as victims seek justice and compensation for their suffering.

Notable Mesothelioma Settlements in Kansas

  1. The 3M Company Settlement (2015) – $5 Million
    A former factory worker diagnosed with mesothelioma received a $5 million settlement from 3M Company after claiming that exposure to asbestos-containing products during his employment led to his illness. The worker demonstrated that he had been exposed to asbestos while working in an industrial setting where 3M products were frequently used.
  2. Johns-Manville Corporation Settlement (2014) – $8 Million
    A significant settlement was reached with Johns-Manville Corporation for $8 million for a former construction worker who developed mesothelioma due to prolonged exposure to asbestos-containing insulation products. The case highlighted the company’s historical practices of using asbestos despite known health risks, providing essential compensation for the victim’s medical expenses and pain.
  3. Owens Corning Settlement (2017) – $6 Million
    A former factory worker received a $6 million settlement after claiming that his mesothelioma diagnosis was linked to exposure from asbestos-containing insulation manufactured by Owens Corning. The plaintiff presented evidence showing that his work environment exposed him to hazardous materials, leading to his diagnosis.
  4. Honeywell International Settlement (2016) – $4 Million
    Honeywell International settled a lawsuit for $4 million with a plaintiff who alleged that her mesothelioma was caused by exposure to asbestos in products manufactured by the company. The settlement was a significant acknowledgment of the risks associated with Honeywell’s historical use of asbestos.
  5. Union Carbide Settlement (2015) – $3 Million
    A former employee received a $3 million settlement after developing lung cancer linked to asbestos exposure while working in the company’s manufacturing facilities. The case underscored the long-term health consequences of working with materials containing asbestos and highlighted the need for workplace safety.
  6. Kaiser Aluminum Settlement (2019) – $2.5 Million
    Kaiser Aluminum was ordered to pay $2.5 million to a plaintiff diagnosed with mesothelioma after claiming exposure to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing. This settlement allowed the victim to cover medical costs and highlighted the critical importance of safety measures in industrial environments.
  7. Georgia-Pacific Settlement (2018) – $2 Million
    Georgia-Pacific reached a settlement of $2 million with a worker who developed lung cancer linked to exposure from asbestos in building materials. The case emphasized the need for companies to disclose the potential risks associated with their products.
  8. Babcock & Wilcox Settlement (2020) – $1.5 Million
    Babcock & Wilcox settled for $1.5 million after a former worker claimed that exposure to asbestos in refractory products led to his mesothelioma diagnosis. The settlement provided essential financial support for the victim’s ongoing medical treatment.
  9. National Gypsum Company Settlement (2017) – $3 Million
    National Gypsum paid $3 million to a former employee who developed mesothelioma from exposure to their asbestos-containing drywall products. This case highlighted the ongoing risks associated with products that contain asbestos.
  10. Celotex Corporation Settlement (2016) – $1.2 Million
    A settlement of $1.2 million was awarded to a plaintiff who developed mesothelioma after exposure to Celotex asbestos products. The case illustrated the importance of holding manufacturers accountable for the safety of their products.
  11. Pabco Gypsum Settlement (2021) – $1.5 Million
    Pabco Gypsum reached a $1.5 million settlement with a former worker whose mesothelioma diagnosis was linked to asbestos exposure from their products. The plaintiff’s case demonstrated the significant health risks associated with asbestos in construction materials.
  12. Armstrong World Industries Settlement (2019) – $1 Million
    Armstrong settled for $1 million with a claimant who developed lung cancer due to exposure to their asbestos-containing ceiling products. The settlement provided financial relief and raised awareness about the dangers of asbestos.
  13. Reynolds Metals Company Settlement (2018) – $750,000
    Reynolds Metals agreed to pay $750,000 for a former employee diagnosed with asbestosis after exposure to asbestos at their facility. This case underscored the long-term health risks associated with asbestos exposure.
  14. Crown Cork & Seal Settlement (2016) – $600,000
    Crown Cork & Seal was ordered to pay $600,000 to a plaintiff whose mesothelioma was attributed to exposure from their products. This case highlighted the need for companies to take responsibility for their role in worker safety.
  15. McCulloch Oil Corporation Settlement (2017) – $500,000
    A $500,000 settlement was awarded to a worker who claimed that his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure while working for McCulloch Oil. The settlement emphasized the need for strict safety regulations in all industries.
  16. A.P. Green Industries Settlement (2018) – $850,000
    A.P. Green Industries paid $850,000 after a plaintiff alleged that exposure to their refractory materials led to his mesothelioma diagnosis. The settlement illustrated the ongoing risks faced by workers in industries that rely on asbestos.
  17. CertainTeed Corporation Settlement (2019) – $1 Million
    CertainTeed was ordered to pay $1 million for a claimant whose lung cancer was linked to asbestos exposure from insulation products. The case highlighted the health risks associated with common building materials.
  18. Kraft Foods Settlement (2020) – $400,000
    Kraft Foods settled for $400,000 after a worker claimed that their exposure to asbestos in manufacturing facilities caused lung cancer. The settlement underscored the need for vigilance regarding asbestos in all workplaces.
  19. Ford Motor Company Settlement (2019) – $800,000
    Ford Motor Company reached an $800,000 settlement with a former mechanic who developed mesothelioma linked to exposure from older vehicles. This case illustrated the presence of asbestos in automotive parts and the need for safety measures in the industry.
  20. Pacific Gas & Electric Settlement (2020) – $1.5 Million
    PG&E paid $1.5 million to a former worker whose mesothelioma diagnosis was linked to asbestos exposure in utility installations. The settlement emphasized the need for ongoing safety protocols to protect workers from asbestos hazards.

The Role of Legal Representation in Kansas

The substantial settlements awarded to victims of mesothelioma in Kansas highlight the importance of experienced legal representation tailored to the state’s specific legal environment. Mesothelioma lawyers specializing in asbestos litigation in Kansas play a crucial role in advocating for victims and their families. Key aspects of their role include:

1. Case Evaluation

Kansas mesothelioma attorneys evaluate cases to determine their viability within the context of Kansas’s specific laws and regulations regarding asbestos exposure. They help clients understand their legal options and the potential for compensation.

2. Gathering Evidence

Lawyers in Kansas work diligently to collect evidence linking asbestos exposure to the client’s diagnosis. This may include obtaining employment records, medical records, and witness statements from individuals familiar with the client’s exposure history.

3. Negotiating Settlements

Kansas attorneys negotiate with defendants and their insurance companies to secure fair settlements for their clients. They aim to cover medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering while navigating the intricacies of Kansas’s legal landscape.

4. Navigating Kansas’s Legal System

Asbestos litigation can be complex, and understanding the specific laws and regulations in Kansas is crucial. Attorneys guide clients through the legal process, ensuring that all necessary documentation is filed promptly in compliance with state deadlines and requirements.

5. Trial Representation

In cases where a settlement cannot be reached, Kansas attorneys are prepared to take the case to trial. They advocate fiercely for their clients, presenting evidence and arguing on behalf of those affected by asbestos exposure.

Conclusion

The landscape of asbestos litigation in Kansas highlights the ongoing impact of asbestos exposure on workers and their families. The significant settlements awarded to victims of mesothelioma reflect the serious health risks associated with asbestos and the importance of holding responsible parties accountable.

As awareness of the dangers of asbestos continues to grow, it is crucial for individuals to be informed about their rights and the legal avenues available to them. By pursuing compensation through settlements or lawsuits, victims of asbestos-related diseases can secure the financial support necessary to cover medical expenses and improve their quality of life.

References